LMG, on 30 October 2011 - 04:19 AM, said:
What if, the Egyptian Agricultural Society had decided that when they had a plethora of colts, that they would have just gelded them, rather then held on to them for awhile or send them to outlying breeding stations, they instead said: "That colt, Nazeer, we have a bunch like him, and we still have the sire, so let's geld him and wait to see what better comes along." There would have been a lot of sorry (whatevers) here in the U.S. who would not have had the Thunderbolt the Wondercolt of the Ages, to hang their hats and futures on, nor would have Poland, and Russia and Germany, and on and on and on.
While it is not likely that some small breeder somewhere will produce the next Nazeer, or *Bask, or Skowronek or ___________, (fill in the blank), it is possible if they used intelligence, and time and research (not just on paper, but by going over the mountain to see what there is to see) it is also not impossible that they just might produce the colt which will set the next standard for this breed.
Lorriee
I like this question because it makes me pause for some
serious thought on the subject. Egypt doesn't have the same
"culture" of gelding that the US does at least partially because they
use and continue to test their colts via the racetrack (at least
within the example of the EAO). Let's take a look at Nazeer briefly
though as an example....
Nazeer was one of Dr. Branch's last RAS breeding decisions, and
in Nazeer's story we see the history & expertise of two of the breed's
master breeders (that also had extensive background as top professional
horsemen of their day) fold together in both the creation & use of this stallion over time.
Von Zantner specifically selected Nazeer from one of the stallion
depots to improve the mares in Egypt he had chosen to use as breeding stock.
Ultimately though, it was Nazeer's exceptional ability to produce
outstanding offspring (that exceeded both himself and the mare in many
instances while still allowing the good qualities of the mare to come through),
that set him apart as we now observe in 20/20 hindsight. And it has become far less
about his individual qualities that Von Zandtner selected him for and/or his race record.
To my mind, history is showing us in this example, that
we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before
us, and in the end equation what really matters is, as Colonel
Fippen would say it, is "what comes out the pipe."
Great quote from Ray here which I really like:
<snip>"With regard to breeding for good colts, or good anything, it's a crap-shoot -
\generally speaking. My Uncle used to say, "Well, let's do something, even if it's wrong."
Which meant, doing something is better, or at least more interesting, than sitting on your
thumbs doing nothing while you grow old and never get anything done. Similarly, "you go
to war with the Army you've got." We go to the breeding shed with the horses we've got.
You can spend a lifetime traveling over that next hilltop in pursuit of perfection. I do agree
that care in choosing the "horses you've got" could be helpful, but you can't spin your wheels
too long worrying about your choices and not making decisions."<snip>
I think Nazeer's history goes nicely with Ray and his Uncle's sentiments here,
but it also goes with the points Lorriee has made regarding
giving the colts a chance to grow & perform before throwing
all efforts out, to be cliche, with the bathwater.
Thanks for the question, all these comments and the wonderful
pictures of horses -- love the thinking, learning and growing!
Jill














